tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114648.post113801037115455156..comments2007-02-17T11:06:01.925-08:00Travishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03941801658095627535noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114648.post-1138079289012176382006-01-23T21:08:00.000-08:002006-01-23T21:08:00.000-08:002006-01-23T21:08:00.000-08:00Anonymous #1—Astute. I should have caught that. And, yeah, monoplayer is not much better than singleplayer, though better nonetheless.<BR/><BR/>Anonymous #2—kekek lol kthxTravishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03941801658095627535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114648.post-1138079130896261352006-01-23T21:05:00.001-08:002006-01-23T21:05:00.001-08:002006-01-23T21:05:00.001-08:00it's fine lrn2concatenateAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114648.post-1138079123578226142006-01-23T21:05:00.000-08:002006-01-23T21:05:00.000-08:002006-01-23T21:05:00.000-08:00True, "multiplayer" is a word; however, "multipleplayer" is not. "Monoplayer" might be a legitimate alternative to "single player", but it's also not very aesthetically pleasing to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com